Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 1–14. Of mice and men, and objectified women: A terror management account of infrahumanization. L., Heflick, N., Vaes, J., Motyl, M., & Greenberg, J. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292–316. Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. The holocaust: A history of the Jews of Europe during the second world war. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.įredrickson, B. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Evaluating Amazon's mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9.Ĭohen, J. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 540–551.Ĭlifford, S., Jewell, R. From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 804–818.Ĭikara, M., Eberhardt, J. Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Ĭastano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. In House Committee on Science and Technology Subcommittee on Domestic and International Scientific Planning, Analysis and Cooperation Research Into Violent Behavior: Sexual Assaults (Eds.), Hearing, 95 th Congress, 2nd session, January 10–12, 1978 (pp. Attitudes supportive of rape in American culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 257–268. Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.īohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. Hunting for you: Examining individual differences in implicit associations of women as prey and men as predators (Unpublished master’s thesis). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: ’s mechanical Turk. Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. New York: Oxford University Press.īartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., & Zawieska, K. Tropp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict. Conflict, delegitimization, and violence. Journal of Research in Personality, 9(4), 253–269. Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims.
New York: Prometheus Books.īandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. “Pricks” and “chicks”: A plea for “persons.” In R. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125.īaker, R. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Such results demonstrate the harmful outcomes that can result from describing romantic interactions where men are the predators and women are the prey.Ībrams, D., Viki, G. Furthermore, a mediation analysis indicated that men exposed to these metaphors were more likely to accept rape myths, which in turn predicted their self-reported greater rape proclivity. Using a broader sample of 76 women and 72 men via MTurk, Study 2 replicated these results and also found metaphor exposure led to greater rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity. college undergraduate sample of 120 women and 82 men in Study 1, exposure to these metaphors led to greater rape myth acceptance among men (but not among women). Participants read a heterosexual dating scenario that did or did not metaphorically frame the situation in predator and prey terms. The present work assessed potential consequences of these metaphoric portrayals. A common metaphor used to describe heterosexual relationships frames men as predators and women as prey.
0 kommentar(er)
